Skip to content
Early access is open
Repic
LoginJoin early access
Brand voice examples

12 brand voices, with what each one refuses to say.

Most brand-voice examples show you a famous company and an adjective. That tells you nothing about what to write on Tuesday. Each card below gives you three things instead: what the voice says, what it will not say, and a caption written in it. The refusals are the useful half, because a voice you can only describe is a mood board and a voice you can refuse things in is a decision rule.

These are illustrative voice cards written to demonstrate the method. They are not customers, case studies or results, and none of them names a real company.

Coverage

One card per archetype, each in a different industry.

Archetypes are a useful shorthand and a poor substitute for a described position, so each card pairs one with a specific trade. The pairing is what makes the refusals concrete rather than generic.

  • Sage
  • Creator
  • Rebel
  • Caregiver
  • Explorer
  • Everyman
  • Magician
  • Hero
  • Jester
  • Ruler
  • Lover
  • Innocent
Sage · Independent financial advice

The plain-spoken adviser

Authority that comes from refusing to oversimplify, in a category where everybody else is either patronising or opaque.

  • Precise
  • Unhurried
  • Anti-hype

Say

  • Name the trade-off explicitly, including the one that is bad for you.
  • Use real numbers when they are yours to share, and say so when they are not.
  • Answer the question that was asked before the question you wish had been asked.

Refuse

  • Never "secrets", "hacks", or anything the reader could not repeat to their accountant.
  • Never urgency that the market did not actually create.
  • Never a claim about returns, because you cannot stand behind one.
  • Never talk down. The reader is uninformed about this, not stupid.

A caption in this voice

Most people asking about index funds are really asking whether they are behind. You are probably not behind, and the honest answer is duller than the question deserves: the fund matters less than the decade you hold it for. Here is what actually changes the outcome, in order.

Why it works: The category is split between patronising and opaque, so a voice that treats the reader as a capable adult with an information gap has almost no competition. The refusals do the work: dropping urgency and returns claims removes the two moves every competitor makes.

Creator · Ceramics and craft

The working studio

Process over product, written from inside the work rather than about it.

  • Tactile
  • Unfinished
  • Specific

Say

  • Describe what the material is doing, in the words you would use in the studio.
  • Show the failed one. The seconds shelf is more interesting than the shop.
  • Name the technique properly, even when it is unfamiliar.

Refuse

  • Never "handcrafted with love", which is the phrase that signals nobody was in the room.
  • Never apologise for a price by explaining how long it took.
  • Never a caption that would work equally well under a photograph of a candle.

A caption in this voice

This glaze wants to be poured at a thickness I keep misjudging. Too thin and the iron burns out, too thick and it crawls off the shoulder in the cool-down. Six tests in, this is the one that held. The other five are on the seconds shelf.

Why it works: Craft accounts default to the finished object and a soft adjective. Writing from inside the process gives an audience a reason to return between products, which is the whole problem a maker has.

Rebel · B2B software

The category heretic

A voice built on naming the thing the category agrees not to mention.

  • Direct
  • Evidenced
  • Unimpressed

Say

  • State the received wisdom, then say plainly why it is wrong.
  • Bring the evidence in the same post. A contrarian without receipts is just loud.
  • Concede the strong version of the other argument before dismantling it.

Refuse

  • Never contrarian for its own sake. If you cannot show the receipt, do not run the post.
  • Never name a competitor to insult them. Attack the practice, not the company.
  • Never manufactured outrage, which reads as marketing within one scroll.

A caption in this voice

Everyone in this category sells "visibility". Nobody sells the thing you actually need, which is fewer dashboards. We spent a quarter counting how many our own team opened in a week. It was two. We built for two.

Why it works: Software categories converge on identical language fast, so the first honest dissent is memorable by default. The evidence rule is what stops it curdling into a personality: the position has to cost something to hold.

Caregiver · Therapy and mental health

The steady room

Warmth with boundaries, in a category where warmth without boundaries is the common failure.

  • Calm
  • Bounded
  • Non-prescriptive

Say

  • Describe an experience without telling the reader what theirs means.
  • Say what is normal before saying what helps.
  • Keep the door open without implying anybody has to walk through it.

Refuse

  • Never diagnose, imply a diagnosis, or invite one in the comments.
  • Never crisis language as a hook.
  • Never "you should". The whole practice is built on not saying that.
  • Never a client story, even anonymised, even with permission.

A caption in this voice

Sunday evening dread is not a character flaw and it is not always about the job. Often it is the first quiet hour in a week, and quiet is when the backlog arrives. If that is familiar, it is worth noticing what turns up in the gap rather than trying to fill it faster.

Why it works: This category punishes overreach, so the refusals are the brand. A voice that consistently declines to diagnose builds more trust than one that consistently reassures, and the constraint is legible to the reader.

Explorer · Outdoor guiding and travel

The honest conditions report

Adventure written by somebody who tells you when not to go.

  • Weathered
  • Concrete
  • Unromantic

Say

  • Lead with conditions, distance and the thing that will actually go wrong.
  • Name the turnaround point and the reason for it.
  • Say when a trip is not worth it this week.

Refuse

  • Never "life-changing", "bucket list", or any phrase from a tour brochure.
  • Never a photograph without the conditions that produced it.
  • Never imply that risk is the point. Competence is the point.

A caption in this voice

The ridge is in, the approach is not. Two river crossings above the knee and the second one is moving faster than it looks in the photo. If you are going this weekend, take the longer eastern line and add ninety minutes. If you are not confident on wet rock, go in three weeks instead.

Why it works: Outdoor content is saturated with aspiration and thin on judgement, so a voice that routinely tells people to stay home reads as the only trustworthy one in the feed. Telling somebody not to buy is the strongest possible signal you are not selling.

Everyman · Bookkeeping for small business

The one who answers the daft question

Deliberately unglamorous, aimed at the person who is embarrassed to ask.

  • Plain
  • Patient
  • Unembarrassing

Say

  • Answer the question people are too self-conscious to ask out loud.
  • Use the words a client would use, not the words on the form.
  • Normalise being behind, then show the first step.

Refuse

  • Never jargon without immediately translating it.
  • Never imply the reader should already know this.
  • Never fear as a motivator. This category has enough of that.

A caption in this voice

Yes, the shoebox is fine. Everybody thinks they are the only one with a shoebox. Start by separating the last twelve months into two piles, money in and money out, and do not sort anything further than that. Sorting further is where people stop.

Why it works: Compliance categories run on low-grade shame, so a voice that removes it has an unusually strong pull. The plainness is a positioning choice rather than a lack of polish, which is why the caption never reaches for authority language.

Magician · Brand and positioning consulting

The one who shows the mechanism

Transformation claims made credible by explaining exactly how the trick works.

  • Structural
  • Revealing
  • Unmystical

Say

  • Show the mechanism, not the result. The mechanism is what people cannot get elsewhere.
  • Give away the framework. The work is applying it, not knowing it.
  • Name what the change actually costs.

Refuse

  • Never mystique. If you cannot explain it, you are describing luck.
  • Never a transformation story without the constraint that made it possible.
  • Never "unlock", "elevate", or any verb that could describe anything.

A caption in this voice

Repositioning is usually subtraction. The last four I worked on all did the same thing: stopped describing three audiences and described one, then let the other two self-select or leave. Two of them lost revenue for a quarter. That is the part nobody writes about.

Why it works: Consulting voices default to mystique because mystique looks like expertise. Showing the mechanism inverts it, because the reader can verify the thinking and therefore trusts the parts they cannot verify.

Hero · Strength and fitness coaching

The unexciting programme

Discipline without the shouting, in a category defined by shouting.

  • Measured
  • Progressive
  • Anti-spectacle

Say

  • Show the boring middle of a programme, not the before and after.
  • Give the actual load, the actual weeks, the actual deload.
  • Say what the plan does not do.

Refuse

  • Never body shame, in either direction.
  • Never a transformation photo. It is the least informative image in the category.
  • Never "no excuses", which is a slogan for people who already train.

A caption in this voice

Week nine looks like nothing. Same lifts, same sets, five kilos more than week eight. This is the part people quit during, because it does not feel like progress and it does not photograph. It is where almost all of the progress is.

Why it works: Fitness content optimises for the spectacular, which means the least spectacular voice occupies an empty position. It also filters correctly: the people who respond to week nine are the people who stay.

Jester · Independent media and newsletters

The serious joke

Funny in service of a real argument, never funny instead of one.

  • Wry
  • Fast
  • Load-bearing

Say

  • Let the joke carry the argument, so removing it would remove the point.
  • Be specific. Generic humour is just tone.
  • Undercut yourself before anybody else can.

Refuse

  • Never a joke at a reader’s expense.
  • Never humour as a hedge against having said something.
  • Never a punchline that would survive being moved to another post.

A caption in this voice

Every company blog eventually publishes "the future of" something. It is the corporate equivalent of a midlife motorcycle. You can tell how the quarter went by how far into the future they went.

Why it works: Humour is the hardest voice to sustain and the easiest to fake, so the rule that the joke must be load-bearing is what keeps it from decaying into tone. It also makes the voice reproducible by somebody other than the founder.

Lover · Wedding and event photography

The one who watches the room

Intimacy through observation, in a category that defaults to superlatives.

  • Observational
  • Restrained
  • Warm

Say

  • Describe the small thing you noticed, not how beautiful the day was.
  • Give the couple their own words back.
  • Show the frames between the moments.

Refuse

  • Never "magical", "perfect", or "dream". They describe nothing and appear everywhere.
  • Never rank a couple or a day against another.
  • Never a caption that is really about your own skill.

A caption in this voice

Her father practised his speech in the corridor four times. On the fifth he gave up on the paper. This is the third attempt, when he was still holding it, and it is the one I would keep.

Why it works: The category is a wall of superlatives, so a single observed detail cuts through more than any adjective can. It also demonstrates the actual service, which is noticing, rather than asserting it.

Innocent · Children’s products

The unpatronising children’s brand

Written for the adult holding the phone, about a child who is treated as a person.

  • Clear
  • Uncloying
  • Practical

Say

  • Write to the parent. The parent is reading.
  • Let the child be competent rather than adorable.
  • Include the practical detail: the wash, the age range, the thing that breaks.

Refuse

  • Never baby talk in the brand voice.
  • Never imply a parent is failing.
  • Never "magical childhood", which is a phrase aimed at guilt.

A caption in this voice

It goes in the machine at forty and comes out the same shape, which is the only feature anybody asked us for. The pockets are deep enough for the things a four-year-old considers essential. We tested that specification thoroughly and involuntarily.

Why it works: Children’s brands drift into a sentimental register aimed at parental guilt. Writing plainly to a competent adult, with a light touch about real life, is both rarer and more effective, because it is the register parents actually use with each other.

How to use these

Write your own refusal list first.

The fastest way to use this page is to skip the cards you like and find the one whose refusals you would actually keep under deadline pressure. Copy those three or four lines, then write the two your own brand needs that none of these have. That list is more operable than any adjective, and it is the part you can hand to somebody else. If you want the rest of the method, the brand voice framework walks through pinning down the traits, and the free brand voice generator will draft a first version from a few answers. The glossary definition covers how voice differs from tone of voice, which is the distinction most of these pages get wrong.

Go deeper

2 min read · 3 sections


Why brand-voice examples usually cannot be used

The standard brand-voice article picks three companies everybody already knows, names the adjective each one is famous for, and stops. It is pleasant reading and it is inert. Knowing that a soft drink sounds optimistic tells a consultant nothing about how to write a post about their rate card on Tuesday morning.

The reason those pages cannot help is structural rather than lazy. A voice described only by what it likes is a mood board, and a mood board gives you no way to decide anything. Every real writing decision is a refusal: the sentence you could have written and did not. So a voice becomes operable at exactly the point where it can rule something out.

That is why each card here leads with a refusal list, and why the list is required to be at least as long as the list of things the voice does say. It is also why every card is pinned to a specific trade rather than left at the archetype: "Sage" refuses almost nothing, while "a financial adviser who will not use urgency the market did not create" refuses something concrete on every post.

None of these are customers. They are written to demonstrate the method, and saying so plainly matters more than it might seem: a grid of voice cards is exactly the shape a reader would otherwise read as a portfolio.


Straight answers

What is a brand voice example?

A brand voice example shows how a specific brand sounds in practice, usually through sample copy. A useful one also states what the voice refuses to say, because writing decisions are made by ruling options out rather than by matching an adjective.

Copy link to this question
How do I write my own brand voice?

Start with the refusal list rather than the adjectives. Write the three or four things your brand will not say even under deadline pressure, then find the traits that explain those refusals. A voice you can rule things out with is one somebody else can write in.

Copy link to this question
Are brand archetypes useful?

As a shorthand, yes. As a substitute for a described position, no. An archetype on its own refuses almost nothing, which is why every card here pairs one with a specific trade so the refusals become concrete.

Copy link to this question
What is the difference between brand voice and tone of voice?

Voice is constant and belongs to the brand: it is who you are on every post. Tone varies with context, so the same voice is gentler in an apology and sharper in a launch. A brand has one voice and many tones.

Copy link to this question
Early access

Describe your brand once. Show up everywhere.

Join early access